Digital Market -

Content: S19-863.docx (15.42 KB)
Uploaded: 14.04.2020

Positive responses: 0
Negative responses: 0

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

An employment contract was concluded with Sakharov, a graduate of URAGS, in which a test was stipulated as an essential condition, the term of which was 5 months, two months of which he had been ill. The administration extended the trial period and a month later dismissed Sakharov due to an unsatisfactory test result. Sakharov objected to dismissal, considering it unlawful to establish a test (since he is a person with a higher professional education), extend the term of the test (because he was absent from work for good reason), the administration refused to dismiss him of his own free will (Sakharov he himself came to the conclusion that the work offered to him was not suitable for him) and to pay him "vacation pay" and severance pay.
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No feedback yet